Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- models [2022/09/14 15:03] – [ICON] burchart
+++ models [2023/07/12 16:00] (current) – [DALES] modiftying text of links chylik
@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 The Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation [[https://github.com/dalesteam/dales|(DALES)]] model is one of the two large eddy simulations (LES) codes employed at InScAPE. A library of prototype cases is used for research and for further code development, including convective cases as well as cases of stratiform clouds. Many of these have been developed within the context of international model intercomparison projects, such as the GCSS boundary layer cloud working group. The library of cases also includes realistic cases at our [[testbed|Testbed]] locations that are based on a blend of observations and analyses obtained from weather forecast models. The testbed part of our case library spans multiple years at multiple locations of interest.
-The current main version of DALES ((Heus et al. (2010). //Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications//. Geoscientific model development 3, (2), pp.415-444. ''doi: 10.5194/gmd-3-415-2010'')) does not include a mixed-phase microphysics scheme. To this purpose we have implemented a full 3-phase microphysics scheme of Seifert-Beheng ((Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D. (2001) //A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection//. At-mos. Res., 59, pp. 265–281. ''doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0'')). This code development work has been supported by the (AC)<sup>3</sup> project. Our [[https://github.com/jchylik/dales/tree/to4.3_Fredrik_sb3cgn|enhanced version]] of DALES has been used for high-resolution simulations of [[arcticclouds|Arctic clouds]] observed during [[http://www.ac3-tr.de/news/acloud-campaign/|ACLOUD]] and PASCAL field campaigns ((Neggers er al. (2019). // Local and remote controls on Arctic mixed-layer evolution//. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.  ''doi:10.1029/2019MS001671'')), and it has also taken part in some model intercomparison studies ((Roode et al. (2019) A large eddy model intercomparison study of the CONSTRAIN cold air outbreak case, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, pp.597-623. ''doi:10.1029/2018MS001443''))
+The current main version of DALES ((Heus et al. (2010). //Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications//. Geoscientific model development 3, (2), pp.415-444. ''doi: 10.5194/gmd-3-415-2010'')) does not include a mixed-phase microphysics scheme. To this purpose we have implemented a full 3-phase microphysics scheme of Seifert-Beheng ((Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D. (2001) //A double-moment parameterization for simulating autoconversion, accretion and selfcollection//. At-mos. Res., 59, pp. 265–281. ''doi:10.1016/S0169-8095(01)00126-0'')). Apart from the full 2-moment scheme, our implementation also offers following options:
+  * prognostic treatment of cloud condensation nuclei
+  * starting with cloud ice profiles based on observations
+  * advection of cloud ice crystals
+This code development work has been supported by the (AC)<sup>3</sup> project. Our enhanced version of DALES ([[https://github.com/jchylik/dales/tree/to4.3_Fredrik_sb3cgn|see GitHub page]]) has been used for high-resolution simulations of [[arcticclouds|Arctic clouds]] observed during field campaigns [[http://www.ac3-tr.de/news/acloud-campaign/|ACLOUD]], PASCAL ((Neggers er al. (2019). // Local and remote controls on Arctic mixed-layer evolution//. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems.  ''doi:10.1029/2019MS001671'')), and [[https://mosaic-expedition.org/|MOSAiC]]. We have also taken part in some model intercomparison studies ((Roode et al. (2019) A large eddy model intercomparison study of the CONSTRAIN cold air outbreak case, Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 11, pp.597-623. ''doi:10.1029/2018MS001443''))
 {{ :wiki:plot1_jan_profiles_q_ci_c_tot_ncc60_g.png?nolink&400 | the model of developing cloud layer on 18 April over Fram Strait }}
@@ Line 28: / Line 33: @@
 //Figure 1. An impression on the ICON-LEM simulations around the Ny Ålesund meteorological site on Spitsbergen performed by the InScAPE group. The left panels shows the set of nested simulations, while the right panel shows a visualization of clouds and the included topography.//
-The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; more information about the GCM version of ICON can be found at the MPI website ([[https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/icon/|ICON]]).
+The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; more information about the GCM version of ICON can be found at the MPI website ([[https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/modeling-with-icon/icon-configurations|ICON]]).