models
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| models [2018/09/07 08:37] – neggers | models [2023/07/12 16:00] (current) – [DALES] modiftying text of links chylik | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| The Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation [[https:// | The Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation [[https:// | ||
| - | The current version of DALES ((Heus et al. (2010). // | + | The current |
| + | * prognostic treatment of cloud condensation nuclei | ||
| + | * starting with cloud ice profiles based on observations | ||
| + | * advection of cloud ice crystals | ||
| + | |||
| + | This code development | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{ : | ||
| Another activity is to implement the ED(MF)< | Another activity is to implement the ED(MF)< | ||
| Line 17: | Line 24: | ||
| === Regional LES and Global climate simulation === | === Regional LES and Global climate simulation === | ||
| - | We use the ICON (Icosahedral non-hydrostatic) model in two different version - the LES version ICON-LEM developed during the [[http:// | + | We use the [[https:// |
| Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable. | Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 33: | ||
| //Figure 1. An impression on the ICON-LEM simulations around the Ny Ålesund meteorological site on Spitsbergen performed by the InScAPE group. The left panels shows the set of nested simulations, | //Figure 1. An impression on the ICON-LEM simulations around the Ny Ålesund meteorological site on Spitsbergen performed by the InScAPE group. The left panels shows the set of nested simulations, | ||
| - | The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; | + | The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; |
models.1536309421.txt.gz · Last modified: 2018/09/07 08:37 by neggers