User Tools

Site Tools


models

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
models [2021/09/23 09:50] – [DALES] adding github link chylikmodels [2022/09/14 17:15] – [ICON] schemann
Line 19: Line 19:
 === Regional LES and Global climate simulation === === Regional LES and Global climate simulation ===
  
-We use the ICON (Icosahedral non-hydrostatic) model in two different version - the LES version ICON-LEM developed during the [[http://www.hdcp2.eu|HDCP2]] project and the general circulation model developed by the Max-Planck-Insitute for Meteorology ([[http://www.mpimet.mpg.de|MPI]]) and the Germany Weather Service ([[http://www.dwd.de|DWD]]).+We use the [[https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/iconpublic|ICON]] (Icosahedral non-hydrostatic) model in two different version - the LES version ICON-LEM developed during the [[http://www.hdcp2.eu|HDCP2]] project and the general circulation model developed by the Max-Planck-Insitute for Meteorology ([[http://www.mpimet.mpg.de|MPI]]) and the Germany Weather Service ([[http://www.dwd.de|DWD]]).
  
 Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable. Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable.
Line 28: Line 28:
 //Figure 1. An impression on the ICON-LEM simulations around the Ny Ålesund meteorological site on Spitsbergen performed by the InScAPE group. The left panels shows the set of nested simulations, while the right panel shows a visualization of clouds and the included topography.// //Figure 1. An impression on the ICON-LEM simulations around the Ny Ålesund meteorological site on Spitsbergen performed by the InScAPE group. The left panels shows the set of nested simulations, while the right panel shows a visualization of clouds and the included topography.//
  
-The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; more information about the GCM version of ICON can be found at the MPI website ([[https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/models/icon/|ICON]]).+The general circulation model version is used for developing and testing parameterizations. At the moment our focus is on the development and implementation of a PDF cloud scheme. For more information on our development of the PDF cloud scheme, see [[cloudscheme|here]]; more information about the GCM version of ICON can be found at the MPI website ([[https://mpimet.mpg.de/en/science/modeling-with-icon/icon-configurations|ICON]]).
  
  
models.txt · Last modified: 2023/07/12 18:00 by chylik