models
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
models [2018/09/07 10:35] – [Single Column Modeling on microgrids] neggers | models [2022/09/14 17:03] – [ICON] burchart | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
The Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation [[https:// | The Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy Simulation [[https:// | ||
- | The current version of DALES ((Heus et al. (2010). // | + | The current |
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
Another activity is to implement the ED(MF)< | Another activity is to implement the ED(MF)< | ||
Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
=== Regional LES and Global climate simulation === | === Regional LES and Global climate simulation === | ||
- | We use the ICON (Icosahedral non-hydrostatic) model in two different version - the LES version ICON-LEM developed during the [[http:// | + | We use the [[https:// |
Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable. | Apart from its innovative triangular grid, ICON has several advantages over existing models; in particular the combination of a non-hydrostatic core with the option of heterogeneous forcing and non-periodic boundaries creates ideal opportunities for research of scale-adaptive parameterizations. The setup allows to simulate various synoptic situations at different places and a reasonable comparison to observational data - with this the testbed-situations for parameterization development is growing and getting more variable. | ||
Line 39: | Line 41: | ||
The LES infrastructure lends itself perfectly for SCM on microgrids, as i) it already has a fully non-hydrostatic dynamical core, and ii) it can easily be run on small grids. An additional advantage in this respect is that the LES is a lot simpler in its setup compared to a GCM, which can enhance the transparency of any numerical experiments, | The LES infrastructure lends itself perfectly for SCM on microgrids, as i) it already has a fully non-hydrostatic dynamical core, and ii) it can easily be run on small grids. An additional advantage in this respect is that the LES is a lot simpler in its setup compared to a GCM, which can enhance the transparency of any numerical experiments, | ||
- | The SCM-on-microgrids approach for developing scale-adaptive convective parameterization has recently been pioneered by InScAPE, by implementing a scale-adaptive version of EDMF based on cloud size distributions into the DALES code ([[https:// | + | The SCM-on-microgrids approach for developing scale-adaptive convective parameterization has recently been pioneered by InScAPE, by implementing a multi-plume |
models.txt · Last modified: 2023/07/12 18:00 by chylik