Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- arcticclouds [2022/09/14 16:59] – [Model codes] burchart
+++ arcticclouds [2023/07/12 17:53] – [Mixed-phase clouds in transforming air masses] updating paper chylik
@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
   * Local and remote controls on Arctic mixed layer evolution [[https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001671|Neggers et al, (2019)]]
   * Investigating Arctic humidity inversions using balloon-borne measurements and large-eddy simulations [[https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-584|Egerer et al. (2021)]]
-  * Aerosol-cloud-turbulence interactions in well-coupled Arctic boundary layers over open water. Chylik et al., in preparation for ACPD, September 2021
+  * Aerosol-cloud-turbulence interactions in well-coupled Arctic boundary layers over open water. [[https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-4903-2023|Chylik et al. (2023)]]
@@ Line 67: / Line 67: @@
 ==== Model codes ====
-At InScAPE the fine-scale simulations of Arctic clouds are performed with two models. The Dutch Atmospheric Large Eddy Simulation model (DALES)
+At InScAPE the fine-scale simulations of Arctic clouds are performed with two models. The Dutch Atmospheric Large Eddy Simulation model ([[https://github.com/dalesteam/dales|DALES]])
 (( Heus, T., Heerwaarden, C. C. v.,  and coauthors (2010). //Formulation of the Dutch Atmospheric Large-Eddy
 Simulation (DALES) and overview of its applications.// Geoscientific model development, **3** (2), pp. 415-444. )) is an LES code that has been developed decades ago, and has participated in many scientific model intercomparison and evaluation studies. The Icosahedral Non-hydrostatic ([[https://code.mpimet.mpg.de/projects/iconpublic|ICON]]) model was recently developed at both MPI Hamburg and the German Weather Service (DWD), and can be applied at multiple resolutions. While both codes share many features, in particular their capability to perform realistic high-resolution simulations of boundary layer clouds, there are also a few key differences. Apart from numerical differences these mainly concern the spatial homogeneity of surface properties such as orography, and the capability to perform simulations in a nested setting. At InScAPE we aim to use both codes in conjunction, profiting from the benefits of both approaches.